| Table | | Page |
| 2.1 | Relative Sensitivity for the Modifications Made in ID-CIMS Compared Against its Initial Sensitivity...................................................................... | 48 |
| 3.1 | Parameters Used to Process Experimental Data to Derive Uptake Coefficients on Different Surfaces............................................................. | 57 |
| 3.2 | Initial and Steady-State Uptake Coefficients of HgCl2 on a Fresh Crystalline Coating Layer Made of Different Salts. Coating Mass is
85-330 mg, Corresponding to a 5-21 μm Effective Coating Thickness..... | 62 |
| 3.3 | The Comparisons of Uptake Coefficients of HgX2 (X=Cl, Br, I) on Hydrated and Dehydrated NaCl Surfaces.................................................. | 78 |
| 3.4 | The Comparisons of Surface Capacities of HgX2 (X=Cl, Br, I) on Dehydrated and Hydrated NaCl Surfaces along with Their Calculated Adsorption Energy and Calculated Distances between Hg and X ........... | 78 |
| 3.5 | Uptake Coefficients and Surface Capacities for Organics......................... | 86 |
| 3.6 | Uptake Coefficients and Surface Capacities for Organic Acids with Different pH............................................................................................... | 91 |
| 3.7 | Particle Number, Surface, and Mass Concentration, along with Calculated GOM Lifetimes Corresponding to Different Scenarios (Urban And Marine, Lower and Higher Aerosol Loading)............................................ | 93 |
| 3.8 | Lifetime Estimations of HgCl2 on the Surfaces of Primary and Secondary Carbonaceous Aerosol Surrogates, Assuming Aerosol Particle Diameters are 0.4 μm................................................................................................... | 95 |
| 4.1 | Raman Shifts (cm-1) of HgCl2, HgBr2, and HgBrCl.a,b.............................. | 105 |